Do You Agree with the View That by 1940?

Do you agree with the skyline that by 1940 the main obstacle to Indian license was not British imperialism further fractions within India? m whatsoever a(prenominal) people confide that in the 1940s virtu tout ensembley of Indias problems involving independence was to do with divisions within India quite than British imperialism. In this essay I go away be looking at both points of mountain and fin alto arisehery giving my opinion. I will be using three cites to a fault to help me expose both sides of the story. I will also be using my further knowledge to add a wider range of knowledge. seminal fluid 15 is a statement take away by Viceroy Linlithgow during discussions with Muhammad Ali Jinnah in August 1940, concerning arrangements for the wartime judicatory of India. In this cite he is both for and against the office of the question. His Majestys Goernment could not theorise transfer of their present responsibilities for the peace and welfare of India to any syste m of Government. This is suggesting that England cant sluice imagine giving any real situation to India. Which means England is withholding any peace for India by not giving them any power.England are also holding back any welfare for India by defying intact the power. However, the Viceroy also says afterwards, Whose warrant is directly denied by large and powerful elements in Indias national career. This quote is truism that divisions within India are slowing agglomerate the proficiency of gaining power for India. Even Englands power over India is being disrupted by the divisions within India. If a specialist governing country is struggling to support in control how is an inexperienced country release away to handle one of the largest countries in the world?Linlithgow make the August offer in 1940 along with Jinnah they discussed a whole range of issues regarding India and the war. The Viceroy did make an causal agent to involve the Muslim community with the proposals in the exalted offer as well. One of the proposals was an assurance that the brass would not adapt any new make-up without the prior approval of Muslim India. This shows that the Viceroy tried and true to prevent divisions within India. Source 16 is a lot more one sided compared to line of descent 15. Source 16 mainly believes that it is British imperialism that is preventing Indian Independence.This source is from W. O. Simpson, from changing horizons, which was published in 1986. One of the some obvious quotes backing up the hatred towards British Imperialism is, The idea, and the Government of India Act that emerged on 1935, was strongly distant by one f feation in the cautious Party, which formed itself into the Imperial Defence conference. This Defence group discussion tried to prevent the Act being passed but it was unsuccessful in its efforts, and the Act was passed. The Act was attacked both in Britain for waiver too far.If Britain didnt go as far as they did with the act they would have had a more successful reign. In this source there is a quote that suggests that divisions within India that was stopping Indian Independence. in India for not going far enough. This quote suggests that India didnt believe the Act wasnt taken out as much as they would have liked. Round add-in conferences did prove that congress didnt speak for all of India, and due to the minority of the Muslims in India the 1937 elections were very brass racking for the Muslims.If Congress came into power they would have been in a very bad situation. The Muslim League needed to win over all of the Muslims and make sure the trials can become fair. Source 17 is much like source 15 because they a both fairly even sided, in what they say. This source is from Rosemary Rees, India 1900-47, published in 2006. It mentions the faults of both British Imperialism and the Divisions between India. If only Congress could, in, fact, speak for all main elements in Indias national life th en, however advanced their demands our problem would have been in many respects, far easier.This quote is strongly suggesting that the division in India is preventing the independence. The fact that England cant get a straight rejoinder from India is making England less(prenominal) confident in giving them independence. They had Congress construction they spoke for the whole of India and they had the Muslim League saw that they dont and because they are the minority in India they should get an equal say in matters so the Congress doesnt good make lives for the Hindus demote and forget about the Muslims. However, Churchill was adamant that he wasnt going to give India up.He didnt even say about it. He knew that he wanted to keep it, therefore in his mind he is going to keep it, no matter what. In source 17 he strongly backs this statement up in saying We mean to hold our own. I have not become the Kings first minister in order to control over liquidation of the British Empire. This quote just shows how incredibly stubborn Churchill was in his views of handing over Indias independence. It didnt matter what was happening around him or what was happening in India, India was Englands and he think it to stay that way.All of these sources mention both points, in distinguishable amounts. I personally believe that it was mainly down to British imperialism that prevented India to gain independence. In the 1940s India make up it hard to find independence at all. though I dont believe it was all down to England. The fact that India couldnt give an answer that related to both Muslims and Hindus meant that England lost trust in them. Gandhi was trying to claim that he was speaking for the whole country, whilst Muslims were pleading not to listen to him. It was all very confusing for the English.